An Asian perspective on improving outcomes for nasal bone fractures by establishing specific treatment options.

Related Articles

An Asian perspective on improving outcomes for nasal bone fractures by establishing specific treatment options.

Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Feb;42(1):46-52

Authors: Yi JS, Kim MJ, Jang YJ

Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report treatment outcomes of patients with different types of nasal bone fracture, following a tailored treatment protocol.
DESIGN: The patterns and the severity of the fractures were determined by a preoperative facial photo and nasal bone computed tomography (CT) retrospectively.
SETTING: A tertiary referral centre.
PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated 129 patients who underwent surgery between March 2002 and January 2014. Patients were subjected to five different treatment methods depending on the severity of injury.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical records were reviewed to assess rates of complications and revision surgery. Cosmetic and functional (the degree of nasal obstruction) outcomes were measured using the Likert scale from 1 (very dissatisfied, severe obstruction) to 5 (very satisfied, no obstruction).
RESULTS: The mean elapsed time from injury to surgery was 14.9 days. The overall treatment failure rate, defined as a deformity that required revision, was 6.2%. The patient satisfaction scores for aesthetic and functional outcomes were 3.9 and 4.6 respectively.
CONCLUSION: The prudent selection of patients with indication for closed reduction, and further specification of variable treatment options for the various degrees of nasal bone fracture, may be helpful in achieving an improved treatment outcome.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV.

PMID: 27086767 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

from PubMed via o.lakala70 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2xDmegT
via IFTTT